Review





Similar Products

genesifter tm microarray data analysis system  (VizX Labs)
90
VizX Labs genesifter tm microarray data analysis system
Genesifter Tm Microarray Data Analysis System, supplied by VizX Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/genesifter tm microarray data analysis system/product/VizX Labs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genesifter tm microarray data analysis system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
genesifter ™ microarray data analysis system  (VizX Labs)
90
VizX Labs genesifter ™ microarray data analysis system
Genesifter ™ Microarray Data Analysis System, supplied by VizX Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/genesifter ™ microarray data analysis system/product/VizX Labs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genesifter ™ microarray data analysis system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
genesifter™ microarray data analysis system  (Geospiza Inc)
90
Geospiza Inc genesifter™ microarray data analysis system
BMDMs RNA was obtained from individual wt and IRF8 mutant F2 mice either prior to (unstimulated control) or 3 hrs following stimulation with IFNγ/CpG (6 samples per experimental group; 24 samples in total), and hybridized to microarrays. (A) By using a 2×2 interaction Anova analysis, 368 genes were recognized to be significantly differentially modulated by IRF8 in response to IFNγ/CpG exposure between the wt and IRF8 mutant cells. The expression profiles are ordered by hierarchical clustering; the genes, illustrated by their specific signal intensities (Log 2 scale) are displayed as rows and individual mouse samples/conditions as columns. Red coloring signifies high level of expression; green coloring denotes low level of expression. The dendrogram illustrates the clustering of the samples according to expression pattern similarities. RNA samples (6 per experimental group) used for this transcriptional profiling analysis were pooled and used for qPCR validation. Ephx1 , Cyp27a1 , Ciita , and Il10ra were selected as genes positively affected by the presence of functional IRF8 following IFNγ/CpG exposure (B), while Ms4a7 , C1qb , Angptl4 , and Slc40a1 were selected as genes negatively affected by the presence of a functional IRF8 following IFNγ/CpG exposure (C). The ratios of expression (IFNγ/CpG-stimulated versus unstimulated control), represented by fold induction, were calculated for the wt and IRF8 mutant mice separately (white bars), and compared to the corresponding <t>microarray</t> results (black bars). The black dots indicate the qPCR values obtained for each replicate. The microarray results were statistically significant according to Anova analysis ( t test p value of 0.05 and a fold-change cutoff of 1.5X). Hprt was used to standardize the mRNA levels of target genes for qPCR.
Genesifter™ Microarray Data Analysis System, supplied by Geospiza Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/genesifter™ microarray data analysis system/product/Geospiza Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genesifter™ microarray data analysis system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
genesifter microarray data analysis system  (VizX Labs)
90
VizX Labs genesifter microarray data analysis system
BMDMs RNA was obtained from individual wt and IRF8 mutant F2 mice either prior to (unstimulated control) or 3 hrs following stimulation with IFNγ/CpG (6 samples per experimental group; 24 samples in total), and hybridized to microarrays. (A) By using a 2×2 interaction Anova analysis, 368 genes were recognized to be significantly differentially modulated by IRF8 in response to IFNγ/CpG exposure between the wt and IRF8 mutant cells. The expression profiles are ordered by hierarchical clustering; the genes, illustrated by their specific signal intensities (Log 2 scale) are displayed as rows and individual mouse samples/conditions as columns. Red coloring signifies high level of expression; green coloring denotes low level of expression. The dendrogram illustrates the clustering of the samples according to expression pattern similarities. RNA samples (6 per experimental group) used for this transcriptional profiling analysis were pooled and used for qPCR validation. Ephx1 , Cyp27a1 , Ciita , and Il10ra were selected as genes positively affected by the presence of functional IRF8 following IFNγ/CpG exposure (B), while Ms4a7 , C1qb , Angptl4 , and Slc40a1 were selected as genes negatively affected by the presence of a functional IRF8 following IFNγ/CpG exposure (C). The ratios of expression (IFNγ/CpG-stimulated versus unstimulated control), represented by fold induction, were calculated for the wt and IRF8 mutant mice separately (white bars), and compared to the corresponding <t>microarray</t> results (black bars). The black dots indicate the qPCR values obtained for each replicate. The microarray results were statistically significant according to Anova analysis ( t test p value of 0.05 and a fold-change cutoff of 1.5X). Hprt was used to standardize the mRNA levels of target genes for qPCR.
Genesifter Microarray Data Analysis System, supplied by VizX Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/genesifter microarray data analysis system/product/VizX Labs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genesifter microarray data analysis system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
the genesifter microarray data analysis system  (VizX Labs)
90
VizX Labs the genesifter microarray data analysis system
BMDMs RNA was obtained from individual wt and IRF8 mutant F2 mice either prior to (unstimulated control) or 3 hrs following stimulation with IFNγ/CpG (6 samples per experimental group; 24 samples in total), and hybridized to microarrays. (A) By using a 2×2 interaction Anova analysis, 368 genes were recognized to be significantly differentially modulated by IRF8 in response to IFNγ/CpG exposure between the wt and IRF8 mutant cells. The expression profiles are ordered by hierarchical clustering; the genes, illustrated by their specific signal intensities (Log 2 scale) are displayed as rows and individual mouse samples/conditions as columns. Red coloring signifies high level of expression; green coloring denotes low level of expression. The dendrogram illustrates the clustering of the samples according to expression pattern similarities. RNA samples (6 per experimental group) used for this transcriptional profiling analysis were pooled and used for qPCR validation. Ephx1 , Cyp27a1 , Ciita , and Il10ra were selected as genes positively affected by the presence of functional IRF8 following IFNγ/CpG exposure (B), while Ms4a7 , C1qb , Angptl4 , and Slc40a1 were selected as genes negatively affected by the presence of a functional IRF8 following IFNγ/CpG exposure (C). The ratios of expression (IFNγ/CpG-stimulated versus unstimulated control), represented by fold induction, were calculated for the wt and IRF8 mutant mice separately (white bars), and compared to the corresponding <t>microarray</t> results (black bars). The black dots indicate the qPCR values obtained for each replicate. The microarray results were statistically significant according to Anova analysis ( t test p value of 0.05 and a fold-change cutoff of 1.5X). Hprt was used to standardize the mRNA levels of target genes for qPCR.
The Genesifter Microarray Data Analysis System, supplied by VizX Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/the genesifter microarray data analysis system/product/VizX Labs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
the genesifter microarray data analysis system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


BMDMs RNA was obtained from individual wt and IRF8 mutant F2 mice either prior to (unstimulated control) or 3 hrs following stimulation with IFNγ/CpG (6 samples per experimental group; 24 samples in total), and hybridized to microarrays. (A) By using a 2×2 interaction Anova analysis, 368 genes were recognized to be significantly differentially modulated by IRF8 in response to IFNγ/CpG exposure between the wt and IRF8 mutant cells. The expression profiles are ordered by hierarchical clustering; the genes, illustrated by their specific signal intensities (Log 2 scale) are displayed as rows and individual mouse samples/conditions as columns. Red coloring signifies high level of expression; green coloring denotes low level of expression. The dendrogram illustrates the clustering of the samples according to expression pattern similarities. RNA samples (6 per experimental group) used for this transcriptional profiling analysis were pooled and used for qPCR validation. Ephx1 , Cyp27a1 , Ciita , and Il10ra were selected as genes positively affected by the presence of functional IRF8 following IFNγ/CpG exposure (B), while Ms4a7 , C1qb , Angptl4 , and Slc40a1 were selected as genes negatively affected by the presence of a functional IRF8 following IFNγ/CpG exposure (C). The ratios of expression (IFNγ/CpG-stimulated versus unstimulated control), represented by fold induction, were calculated for the wt and IRF8 mutant mice separately (white bars), and compared to the corresponding microarray results (black bars). The black dots indicate the qPCR values obtained for each replicate. The microarray results were statistically significant according to Anova analysis ( t test p value of 0.05 and a fold-change cutoff of 1.5X). Hprt was used to standardize the mRNA levels of target genes for qPCR.

Journal: PLoS Genetics

Article Title: Interferon Regulatory Factor 8 Regulates Pathways for Antigen Presentation in Myeloid Cells and during Tuberculosis

doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002097

Figure Lengend Snippet: BMDMs RNA was obtained from individual wt and IRF8 mutant F2 mice either prior to (unstimulated control) or 3 hrs following stimulation with IFNγ/CpG (6 samples per experimental group; 24 samples in total), and hybridized to microarrays. (A) By using a 2×2 interaction Anova analysis, 368 genes were recognized to be significantly differentially modulated by IRF8 in response to IFNγ/CpG exposure between the wt and IRF8 mutant cells. The expression profiles are ordered by hierarchical clustering; the genes, illustrated by their specific signal intensities (Log 2 scale) are displayed as rows and individual mouse samples/conditions as columns. Red coloring signifies high level of expression; green coloring denotes low level of expression. The dendrogram illustrates the clustering of the samples according to expression pattern similarities. RNA samples (6 per experimental group) used for this transcriptional profiling analysis were pooled and used for qPCR validation. Ephx1 , Cyp27a1 , Ciita , and Il10ra were selected as genes positively affected by the presence of functional IRF8 following IFNγ/CpG exposure (B), while Ms4a7 , C1qb , Angptl4 , and Slc40a1 were selected as genes negatively affected by the presence of a functional IRF8 following IFNγ/CpG exposure (C). The ratios of expression (IFNγ/CpG-stimulated versus unstimulated control), represented by fold induction, were calculated for the wt and IRF8 mutant mice separately (white bars), and compared to the corresponding microarray results (black bars). The black dots indicate the qPCR values obtained for each replicate. The microarray results were statistically significant according to Anova analysis ( t test p value of 0.05 and a fold-change cutoff of 1.5X). Hprt was used to standardize the mRNA levels of target genes for qPCR.

Article Snippet: The GeneSifter™ microarray data analysis system (Geospiza Inc., Seattle, WA, USA) was used to examine data generated from comparisons between control (unstimulated) and IFNγ/CpG-stimulated (3 hrs) groups.

Techniques: Mutagenesis, Expressing, Functional Assay, Microarray